Subject	Read your gauge - that's 1.25 kg/ cm^2, not 1.25 BAR
Posted by	boileralum on November 13, 2004 at 8:22 PM
	This message has been viewed 69 times.
In Reply To	It spiked to the 1.25 held at 1.20 posted by ImTheDevil on November 13, 2004 at 07:18 PM
Message	1.25 kilograms-force per square centimetre is 17.77917875 pounds-force per square inch. 1.25 bars is 18.1297175 pounds-force per square inch. Calculations courtesy of [ http://www.markhorrell.com/tools/pressure.asp ] Rule #1 - There's always a bastard! JRH(KY): for some reason, when I hear the word 'tranny' I think of transvestite before I do transmission. don't ask me why boileralum: FAGMO! ----------------------------------------- Bill (ImTheDevil): blah blah blah me: Just because you are covered in gasoline right now, doesn't mean you are right! ----------------------------------------- JRH (KY): I'm also using up a weekend this month for Indy and a weekend next month for the USGP. Throw in our trip to PA and GF is getting tired of my car habit. Boy I'm going to miss her :-D
Follow Ups	dyno numbers, pics later - ImTheDevil 13:39:03 11/13/04 nice numbers for stock turbo's (n/m) - ix3 13:42:35 11/13/04 Huge 2nd! - CMH (OH) 14:21:04 11/13/04 3rd! (n/m) - Palehorse13 17:42:56 11/13/04 really? why? - Spee 01:48:03 11/14/04 Whoops, - CMH (OH) 10:44:16 11/14/04 congrats monkey. I talked to teh Ric - he wants to make - boileralum 15:16:05 11/13/04 Congrats man (n/m) - MickieMagik(oh) 15:47:15 11/13/04 Very nice runs! Any idea the A/F? (n/m) - SeedyROM 15:57:53 11/13/04 1.25 Bar? Isn't that a little high for stockers? - merlin14 18:57:21 11/13/04 For a few short runs (track or otherwise) or a dyno session - SeedyROM 18:59:27 11/13/04 get the email? :) (n/m) - ImTheDevil 19:18:53 11/13/04 Hmm, no I don't think so - SeedyROM 19:57:33 11/13/04 resent :) (n/m) - ImTheDevil 21:48:10 11/13/04 It spiked to the 1.25 held at 1.20 - ImTheDevil 19:18:23 11/13/04 Read your gauge - that's 1.25 kg/ cm^2, not 1.25 BAR - boileralum 20:22:43 11/13/04 Who is going to rebuild it? - dpjax 22:24:05 11/13/04 Should have higher torque than that. (n/m) - Woody75 (Denver) 12:43:12 11/14/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.